|
It looks as if the AT&T deal to purchase T-Mobile may be more dead than Chumbawamba’s music career. As first reported in the Wall Street Journal,
“U.S. regulators made clear how deep their opposition runs to AT&T Inc.’s proposed $39 billion deal to acquire T-Mobile USA, saying AT&T must face an extra review next year that could eat up months even if the company wins an antitrust trial.
The unusual decision by the Federal Communications Commission to call the extra hearing—its first such move in nine years—adds a new roadblock and forces AT&T to consider an unpalatable range of options.”
Awesome. I can’t stand AT&T. Probably because I used to have a BellSouth mobile phone and then AT&T became the provider. I was always overcharged and customer service was worse than the AOL guy’s experience. Then the iPhone, aka “Jesus Phone” came out, and it was only available through AT&T. Phone service with AT&T in Los Angeles might have been just plain bad when this phone was released. With regards to this deal, AT&T was so confident that they would get it done, that they offered a $3Billion dollar break-up fee to T-mobile, plus $3Billion – $4Billion in spectrum/other assets if the deal went south. You cocky bastards. So yeah, I’m just a little bit turned off by that company, but that’s beside the point.
Marguerite Reardon, of CNET writes in her article,
The Department of Justice’s case against AT&T is scheduled to begin in February. If the court sides with the DOJ and orders an injunction, then the FCC’s transfer of the licenses won’t mean much since the court will be ordering the companies not to proceed with their merger.
But if AT&T wins its case, AT&T will have some legal basis to fight the FCC in its administrative law judge hearings. The FCC has said that it will wait until the conclusion of the DOJ’s case against AT&T before it proceeds with its hearings.
Still, AT&T will also be facing other lawsuits seeking to block the merger. If AT&T is able to win all these lawsuits, it will likely have found some strong legal arguments to keep the merger alive. And will therefore have a much stronger case when it needs to provide evidence to the administrative law judge that its merger is in the public interest.
But if AT&T loses at any point along the way, which many believe is a strong possibility, AT&T will also likely lose its case in front of the administrative judge. Still, AT&T could drag out the legal battles if it chooses to fight any lawsuits that it loses.
Most companies, when faced with so much opposition from regulators and the potential for a long and drawn-out legal battle, simply give up. That’s what happened in 2002 when the FCC referred the deal between Echostar and DirecTV to an administrative law judge.
But so far, AT&T has remained steadfast in its resolve to do what it takes to get the merger done. After the Justice Department filed its lawsuit against the merger, AT&T strongly defended its position.
“We remain confident that this merger is in the best interest of consumers and our country, and the facts will prevail in court,” AT&T’s general counsel Wayne Watts said in a statement the day that the DOJ filed its suit.
Either someone farted, or I smell bull crap. And maybe I’m being too harsh on AT&T. They’ve done some things I have liked in recent years. However, one must consider: Anti-Trust laws were put into effect for a reason; when you’ve got people suing the crap out of you from all angles, perhaps it’s for a good reason. Just something to ponder.
About WheresBigFoot: WheresBigFoot is a part of Global Internet Marketing Company specializing in SEO web marketing and Pay per Click Advertising. Sign up an account today to advertise your website. Learn more about WheresBigFoot by visiting us at www.wheresbigfoot.com |
Categories
Visitor's Comments